Business & Commercial Litigation
From breach of contract to complex multi-party disputes — South Florida trial counsel for businesses, partners, and principals.
Breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, business torts, accounts receivable, guaranty enforcement, and disputes arising from failed business transactions.
Partner and shareholder oppression, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate dissolution, buyout disputes, and claims involving closely held businesses.
Misappropriation of trade secrets under Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and enforcement and defense of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements.
Types of Commercial Matters We Handle
- Breach of contract
- Breach of fiduciary duty
- Business torts
- Civil conspiracy
- Civil theft (Fla. Stat. § 772.11)
- Construction defect claims
- Corporate & LLC dissolution
- Defamation (business)
- FDUTPA (deceptive trade practices)
- Fraud & fraudulent inducement
- Fraudulent misrepresentation
- Injunctions & emergency relief
- Negligent misrepresentation
- Non-compete & non-solicitation
- Oral contracts
- Promissory estoppel
- Quantum meruit
- Quasi-contract claims
- Tortious interference (business)
- Tortious interference (contract)
- Trade secret misappropriation
- Unjust enrichment
Reported Commercial Decisions
A selection of reported decisions in business and commercial matters — in Florida circuit courts and federal district courts.
Disclaimer: The following is a selection of reported decisions for informational purposes only. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. The outcome of any particular case depends on the facts, law, and circumstances unique to that case.
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
2026 WL 376656
Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirming the trial court’s order vacating a default judgment in foreclosure action, finding excusable neglect properly established where the default resulted from attorney abandonment rather than client conduct. Foreclosure defense / appellate litigation.
United States District Court
Southern District of Florida
346 F.R.D. 146
Satellite discovery litigation in the Southern District of Florida arising from a trade secret misappropriation dispute in the biotech manufacturing industry. The Burton Firm represented a Florida-based non-party witness subject to a deposition subpoena; when the plaintiff sought to extend her deposition beyond fourteen hours of prior testimony, the court denied the motion under Rule 30(d)(1), finding no good cause to reopen discovery against a non-party witness.
United States District Court
Southern District of Florida
2022 WL 668340
Represented a former biotech executive in a Southern District of Florida employment lawsuit alleging wrongful termination, sexual harassment, and hostile work environment under Title VII, as well as defamation, invasion of privacy (public disclosure of private facts), fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress under Florida law. The court found a prima facie basis for sanctions under its inherent power and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 based on the defendant’s repeated failure to disclose an Employment Practices Liability Insurance policy covering her claims, in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and Fla. Stat. § 627.4137. Final ruling was reserved pending full development of harm; the defendant’s cross-motion for sanctions was denied as meritless.
United States District Court
Southern District of Florida
Fort Lauderdale Division
2015 WL 5853124
Securities fraud action on behalf of plaintiff Janos Solyom, who claimed he was induced by an alleged “boiler room” operation to purchase stock and pay advance fees to fictitious companies. Claims were brought under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, along with common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy. The Southern District of Florida denied summary judgment, finding genuine issues of material fact on both agency attribution and the statute of limitations discovery rule.
Miami-Dade County Circuit Court
Final judgment in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County, on claims arising from breach of promissory notes.
Miami-Dade County Circuit Court
Jury verdict for plaintiff Rumbaut & Company, Inc. after a five-day trial in Miami-Dade County. Julio Rumbaut, a veteran media broker and co-founder of Telemundo of Florida, alleged that he introduced two Spanish-language broadcasting groups, facilitated their negotiations, and was then cut out of the joint venture they formed without notice or compensation. Claims for unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and civil conspiracy.